cc: "Tim Osborn" <t.osborn@uea.ac.uk>
date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:35:56 +0100
from: "Rachel Warren" <r.warren@uea.ac.uk>
subject: results
to: "Rita Yu" <ritayu918@gmail.com>

Rita

The results for 400 ppm stabilization look odd in many cases as I have
commented before.

I would like to try to understand why, before we finish the paper.  As
it stands we'll have to delete
the results from the paper if it is to be published.

The Figure 2 you are going to send me will help with this
(understanding the global T and conc
that we set).

Do you have the CIAS configuration files that you used?  We need to
check that the model
settings you used for the stabilisation scenarios for 550. 500 and 450
were exactly
the same as the ones you used for 400, in particular the ClimGen settings.
I also need to see what those settings were so that I can try to think why the
outputs of thr 400 might be anomalous.

Best wishes
Rachel


-- 
Dr Rachel Warren
Senior Research Fellow
Tyndall Centre
Zuckermann Institute
University of East Anglia
Norwich NR4 7TJ

Telephone 01603 593912
Fax 01603 593901
E-mail r.warren@uea.ac.uk
