cc: Claire Waelbroeck <Claire.Waelbroeck@lsce.cnrs-gif.fr>
date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:01:16 -0500
from: "W.R. Peltier" <peltier@atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca>
subject: Re: [Wg1-ar4-ch06] Chapter 6 update and calendar
to: clairew@lsce.cnrs-gif.fr, Jonathan Overpeck <jto@u.arizona.edu>, wg1-ar4-ch06@joss.ucar.edu

Dear Claire,
      Sorry to have mistaken your silence for acquiescence. Of course 
I'm more than willing to continue the discussion with you. Once you 
had realized that we were using different definitions of what is 
meant by "ice equivalent eustatic sea level thought that you had 
grasped the point of the analysis that Rick and I have performed. 
Since you've sent a .pdf discussing your remaining issues I cannot 
provide further discussion interlineally as before. However I will 
comment on these in a separate e-mail to which your .pdf will be 
attached for reference.
Best
Dick






At 01:40 PM 13/11/2006, clairew@lsce.cnrs-gif.fr wrote:
>Dear all,
>I haven't had the time to answer to Dick Peltier's last message
>(received on November 8) but still disagree with some important points
>in it. I wish that he would have checked with me that I indeed did not
>asked any change any longer to the text written in the IPCC report
>before writing so to all of you.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>  Claire Waelbroeck
>
>
>
>At 10:17 -0500 13/11/06, W.R. Peltier wrote:
>>Dear All,
>
>       This is just to you know that I have had a further useful
>exchange with Claire Waelbroeck on her issues with the text
>surrounding my discussion of the sea level figure. Since the Peltier
>and Fairbanks paper that is central to this figure is now available
>through the QSR website, Claire has been able to go over it in some
>detail. She now understands that the definition I employ for the
>phrase "ice equivalent eustatic sea level" differs from the
>definition she has been assuming. This definition is such that her
>bottom water temperature corrected sea level history is in fact
>directly comparable to the history that I infer based upon the ice
>mass contained in the ICE-5G reconstruction. I'm very glad that we
>have managed to sort this out ---  no change is required to the text
>that I have written.
>
>Sincerely
>Dick
>
>

_______________________________________________
Wg1-ar4-ch06 mailing list
Wg1-ar4-ch06@joss.ucar.edu
http://lists.joss.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wg1-ar4-ch06
