date: Mon Aug 14 15:50:02 2006
from: Keith Briffa <k.briffa@uea.ac.uk>
subject: Re: Oerlemans in IPCC
to: Georg Kaser <Georg.Kaser@uibk.ac.at>

   George - will do
   best wishes
   Keith
   At 15:37 14/08/2006, you wrote:

     Dear Keith, this is fine. You may add a reference to Chapter 4 instead. Best wishes,
     Georg
     Georg Kaser
     -------------------------------------------------
     Institut fuer Geographie
     Innrain 52
     A-6020 INNSBRUCK
     AUSTRIA
     Tel: ++43 512 507 5407
     Fax: ++43 512 507 2895
     [1]http://meteo9.uibk.ac.at/IceClim/CRYO/cryo_a.html
     On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Keith Briffa wrote:

     Sorry George - forgot to include you on last response to Olga - I thought we would make
     only one very small change to remove repetition - see message repeated below
     cheers
     Keith
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
     Olga
     thanks for this - I suggest we simply remove the last sentence only from our section
     (6-30-43-55) "In southern Norway,.......temperatures (Nesje and Dahl, 2003)."  The rest
     is consistent but not repetitive , with our discussion relating to the temperature
     interpretation only. Cheers
     Keith
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     -----------------------------------------------------------------------
     At 15:19 14/08/2006, Georg Kaser wrote:

     Dear Olga and Keith,
     have many thanks for the cross check. As for the paragraphs cited from Chapetr 4, only
     slight changes have been made that do not affect the content (see attached Chapter4).
     The Oerlemans regions have been named in the Figure 4.5.1 caption.
     Also the Oerlemans paragraph in Chapter 6 is fine and I hope you can keep it as it is.
     As for the paragraph on the Tropical isotop analyses the first part is fine, the second
     one contradicts the respective Chapter 4:
     You state:
     "Very rapid and apparently unprecedented melting of tropical ice caps has been observed
     in recent decades (Thompson et al., 2000; Thompson, 2001) (see Box 6.3), likely
     associated with enhanced warming at high elevations (Gaffen et al., 2000), but other
     factors besides temperature can strongly influence tropical glacier mass balance (see
     Chapter 4)."
     We show that the shrinkage of Tropical glaciers has the same time pattern and the same
     magnitude as the shrinkage of glaciers in the mid latitudes since the "Littel Ice Age".
     They melt not more rapid than comparable glaciers somewhere else and not in an
     unprecented way (e.g. shrinkage rates have been stronger in the 1940s).
     There is only one exception: Kilimanjaro plateau. There, glacier shrinkage is NOT due to
     20th century climate change. (see respective paragraph in the attached Chapter 4 draft).
     I also attach the respective Kilimanjaro paper that went into press in order to make the
     TSU deadline in July.
     If you refer to the Quelccaya Ice Cap, make clear that you talk about that only and that
     it was reported that meltwater had penetrated the ice where it was still "dry" in the
     1970s. One cannot deviate general "Very rapid and apparently unprecedented melting of
     tropical ice caps in recent decades" from this.
     Best wishes,
     Georg
     Georg Kaser
     -------------------------------------------------
     Institut fuer Geographie
     Innrain 52
     A-6020 INNSBRUCK
     AUSTRIA
     Tel: ++43 512 507 5407
     Fax: ++43 512 507 2895
     [2]http://meteo9.uibk.ac.at/IceClim/CRYO/cryo_a.html
     On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, olgasolomina wrote:

     Dear Georg and Keith,
     We discuss Oerleman?s paper two times ? in Ch 6 and Ch 4. I copied here the sections
     from both chapters. I guess you have to decide what to keep and where. I also copied a
     paragraph from ch6 concerning the glacier retreat ? Georg might be interested to see it.
     We decided to write ?Little Ice Age? and ?Medieval Warm Period? in quotes. Shall we
     correct it now? This should be consistent though the whole Assessment ? we probably have
     to draw attention of TSU to this point.
     Cheers,
     olga
     From SOD ch 4
     4-14-2-12
     4.5.2. Large and Global Scale Analyses
     Records of glacier length changes go far back in time (written reports as far back as
     1600 in a few cases) and are directly related to low-frequency climate change. From 169
     glacier-length records, Oerlemans (2005) has compiled mean length variations of glacier
     tongues for large scale regions from 1700 to 2000 (Figure 4.5.1). Although much local to
     regional and high-frequency variability is superimposed, the smoothed series give an
     apparently homogeneous signal. General retreat of glacier termini started after 1800,
     with considerable mean retreat rates in all regions after 1850 lasting throughout the
     20th century. A slowdown of retreats between about 1970 and 1990 is more evident in the
     raw data. Retreats were again generally rapid in the 1990s; the Atlantic and the
     Southern Hemisphere curves reflect precipitation driven advances of glaciers in Western
     Scandinavia and New Zealand (Chinn et al., 2005).
     4-18-32-41
     The surface mass balance of snow and ice is determined by a complex interaction of
     energy fluxes toward and away from the surface, and the occurrence of solid
     precipitation. Nevertheless, glacier fluctuations show a strong statistical correlation
     with air temperature at least on a large spatial scale throughout the 20th century
     (Greene, 2005), and a strong physical basis exists to explain why warming would cause
     mass loss. Changes in snow accumulation also matter, and may dominate in response to
     strong circulation changes or when temperature is not changing greatly. For example,
     analyses of glacier mass balances, volume changes, length variations and homogenized
     temperature records for the western portion of the European Alps (Vincent et al., 2005)
     clearly indicate the role of precipitation changes in glacier variations in the 18th and
     19th centuries. Similarly, Nesje and Dahl (2003) explained glacier advances in southern
     Norway in the early 18th century based on increased!

      w!

     inter precipitation rather than cold temperatures.
     FROM TOD ch 6
     6-30-43-55
     Oerlemans (2005) constructed a temperature history for the globe based on

     169 glacier-length records. He used simplified glacier dynamics that
     incorporate specific response time and climate sensitivity estimates for each
     glacier. The reconstruction suggests that moderate global warming occurred
     after the middle of the 19th century, with about 0.6?C warming by the middle
     of the 20th century. Following a 25-year cooling, temperatures rose again
     after 1970, though much regional and high-frequency variability is
     superimposed on this overall interpretation. However, this approach does not
     allow for changing glacier sensitivity over time, which may limit the
     information before 1900. For example, analyses of glacier mass balances,
     volume changes, and length variations along with temperature records in the
     western European Alps (Vincent et al., 2005) indicate that between 1760 and
     1830, glacier advance was driven by precipitation that was 25% above the 20th
     century average, while there was little difference in average temperatures.
     Glacier retreat after 1830 was related to reduced winter precipitation and
     the influence of summer warming only became effective at the beginning of the
     20th century. In southern Norway, early 18th century glacier advances can be
     attributed to increased winter precipitation rather than cold temperatures
     (Nesje and Dahl, 2003).

     I also copy here a paragraph from ch 6 that you might want to take into account.
     FROM TOD ch 6
     6-32-40-48
     Stable isotope data from high-elevation ice cores provide long records and have been
     interpreted in terms of past temperature variability (Thompson, 2000), but recent
     calibration and modelling studies, in South America and southern Tibet (Hoffmann et al.,
     2003; Vuille and Werner, 2005; Vuille et al., 2005), indicate a dominant sensitivity to
     precipitation changes, at least on seasonal to decadal timescales, in these regions.
     Very rapid and apparently unprecedented melting of tropical ice caps has been observed
     in recent decades (Thompson et al., 2000; Thompson, 2001) (see Box 6.3), likely
     associated with enhanced warming at high elevations (Gaffen et al., 2000), but other
     factors besides temperature can strongly influence tropical glacier mass balance (see
     Chapter 4).
     --
     Dr.Olga Solomina
     Corresponding Member of Russian Academy of Sciences
     Institute of Geography RAS
     Staromonetny-29
     Moscow, Russia
     tel: 007-095-125-90-11, 007-095-939-01-21
     fax: 007-095-959-00-33
     e-mail: olgasolomina@yandex.ru
     PAGES Web:www.pages-igbp.org
     --
     ??????? ??????? ????, ????? ??????? ????? ?? ??????? [3]http://mail.yandex.ru

     --
     Professor Keith Briffa,
     Climatic Research Unit
     University of East Anglia
     Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K.
     Phone: +44-1603-593909
     Fax: +44-1603-507784
     [4]http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/people/briffa/

     --
     Professor Keith Briffa,
     Climatic Research Unit
     University of East Anglia
     Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K.

     Phone: +44-1603-593909
     Fax: +44-1603-507784
     [5]http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/people/briffa/

