date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:28:16 +0100
from: "Palmer Dave Mr (LIB)" <David.Palmer@uea.ac.uk>
subject: RE: ICO request [FOI_08-23]
to: "Tim Osborn" <t.osborn@uea.ac.uk>

Tim,
Michael and I are putting together a draft response to submit to the ICO
when requested and we are reviewing the 'evidence' that supports our
case.  I don't seem to have a copy of the correspondence that you
mention from Jouzel, Solomina & Ammann) that you mention below.  Nor can
I find any correspondence from John Mitchell regarding his attitude to
the release of the requested information - could you have a look at your
files and forward the correspondence to me please?  
We are meeting Monday afternoon so if I could get it before then it
would be great - understand that this is very late notice so no worries
if you can't get to it. 
Many thanks in advance.

Cheers, Dave 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tim Osborn [mailto:t.osborn@uea.ac.uk] 
>Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 11:36 AM
>To: Palmer Dave Mr (LIB); Mcgarvie Michael Mr (ACAD)
>Cc: Briffa Keith Prof (ENV); Jones Philip Prof (ENV)
>Subject: RE: ICO request [FOI_08-23]
>
>Hi again,
>
>I've put together the attached table listing all those named in the 
>FOI request or who we have relevant correspondence with, together 
>with their response to our enquiries about confidentiality/release of 
>materials.
>
>It is based on the responses from colleagues that I sent you last 
>12th May, plus 3 further responses (Jouzel, Solomina, Ammann) that 
>arrived after that.
>
>Hope this suffices.
>
>I've got hard copy of typical correspondence, plus hard copy of the 3 
>further responses regarding confidentiality.  Should I send these via 
>internal mail to Dave?  What is your internal address?  Just "Dave 
>Palmer, LIB"?
>
>Cheers
>
>Tim
>
>At 10:12 23/04/2009, Palmer Dave Mr \(LIB\) wrote:
>>Tim [et al],
>>I'd like to add my thanks as well - I've had a quick view of the
>>document and will provide comments suggestions in the near 
>future.  Rom
>>my perspective, it's a question of providing both context and reasons
>>why the information 'fits' within the exemptions that we have cited so
>>the evidence/context needs to align/support those exemptions.
>>The other piece of work that I will attend to is mapping the request
>>onto EIR, should the ICO decree that we must go that route...
>>
>>Cheers, Dave
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Mcgarvie Michael Mr (ACAD)
>> >Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:01 AM
>> >To: Osborn Timothy Dr (ENV); Palmer Dave Mr (LIB)
>> >Cc: Briffa Keith Prof (ENV); Jones Philip Prof (ENV)
>> >Subject: RE: ICO request
>> >
>> >Tim,
>> >
>> >Thanks very much for this.  Dave and I have had to move our
>> >meeting yesterday from this morning to 7th May, so if you need
>> >abit more time to let us have any further information you 
>now have it!
>> >
>> >Regards
>> >
>> >Michael
>> >
>> >
>> >Michael McGarvie
>> >Director of Faculty Administration
>> >Faculty of Science
>> >Room 0.22B
>> >University of East Anglia
>> >Norwich NR4 7TJ
>> >
>> >tel: 01603 593229
>> >fax: 01603 593045
>> >
>> >m.mcgarvie@uea.ac.uk
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Tim Osborn [mailto:t.osborn@uea.ac.uk]
>> >Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:05 PM
>> >To: Palmer Dave Mr (LIB); Mcgarvie Michael Mr (ACAD)
>> >Cc: Briffa Keith Prof (ENV); Jones Philip Prof (ENV)
>> >Subject: RE: ICO request
>> >
>> >Hi Dave and Michael,
>> >
>> >attached is a replacement to the draft that Phil sent earlier.  I
>> >think it covers items 1, 3, 4 and 6 on the list below, though we
>> >could perhaps expand on 6 if necessary.  The previous letters from
>> >Susan Solomon and our co-authors should of course accompany this as
>> >support.  Note that Keith has not had a chance to see any of this
>> >because he had to go to Liverpool at urgent notice last Thursday due
>> >to family illness and now bereavement and so is,
>> >understandably, still away.
>> >
>> >I have collated some examples for item 5.  Phil is taking a look to
>> >see if they are a fair representation of the type of material.  I'll
>> >pass these on to you tomorrow (they are all hard copy).
>> >
>> >I'll make a table/list for item 2 tomorrow morning and 
>email it to you.
>> >
>> >Best wishes
>> >
>> >Tim
>> >
>> >At 15:01 17/04/2009, Mcgarvie Michael Mr \(ACAD\) wrote:
>> >>
>> >>I hope that you have all had a really good Easter break.
>> >>
>> >>I have arranged to meet up with Dave Palmer next Thursday 
>(23rd April)
>> >>to progress the response to the ICO.  If there is any 
>information from
>> >>the action list (included below for ease of reference) 
>that you could
>> >>send me in advance, I would be grateful.
>> >>
>> >>Many thanks
>> >>
>> >>Michael
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>ACTION LIST:
>> >>
>> >>1. Details of web links for the copy of the final IPCC report
>> >as well as
>> >>links to drafts and comments on drafts.
>> >>
>> >>2. List of members of the working group - I will then do a 
>table that
>> >>shows who replied to Tim's email.
>> >>
>> >>3. A description/statement of the process followed by IPCC authors,
>> >>including that much of this was by round table discussion
>> >>
>> >>4. Any IPCC guidance that was given to authors and how they were
>> >>expected to operate.
>> >>
>> >>5. Some examples of the types of email exchanges that took 
>place that
>> >>could go to the ICO
>> >>
>> >>6. Statement clarifying the possible damage to international
>> >>collaboration if email exchanges of this kind can be made publicly
>> >>available
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>
