cc: Phil Jones <P.Jones@uea.ac.uk>,"Michael E. Mann" <mann@virginia.edu>
date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:35:31 +0000
from: Tim Osborn <t.osborn@uea.ac.uk>
subject: Fwd: QSR 19 (2000) 87-105
to: Keith Briffa <k.briffa@uea.ac.uk>

<x-flowed>
Keith,

looks like you might be the next focus of McIntyre!

I haven't replied yet, but when I get round to it I will simply say "don't 
ask me, it's not my data or paper".  After that, I guess he'll send the 
request to you - unless he already has.

Cheers

Tim


>From:   "Steve McIntyre" <stephen.mcintyre@utoronto.ca>
>To:     "Tim Osborn" <t.osborn@uea.ac.uk>
>Subject: QSR 19 (2000) 87-105
>Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:07:09 -0500
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
>
>Dear Tim,
>
>In Keith Briffa's QSR 2000 article, his Figure 1f contains a version of 
>the Yamal chronology which has a very different appearance than the Yamal 
>chronology archived at WDCP by Hantemirov or published by Hantemirov et al 
>in Holocene 2002. The QSR 2000 article refers to a Russian journal 
>inaccessible to me and does not provide a citation for the data set in a 
>public archive, sufficient to enable the downloading of this data.  Have 
>Hantemirov et al. archived the different data version that WDCP (and 
>presumably used in QSR Fig 1f) in some other official archive than WDCP? 
>Does the version archived by Hantemirov et al at WDCP supercede the 
>version used by Briffa? If Hantemirov have archived the data, could you 
>send me the URL? (I am aware of the Briffa URL for the QSR Figure 1, but 
>that is obviously a secondary source.)  If Hantemirov has not archived the 
>data, I'd be interested in the source of the data.
>
>Thanks for your help.
>
>Regards, Steve McIntyre
>

Dr Timothy J Osborn
Climatic Research Unit
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia
Norwich  NR4 7TJ, UK

e-mail:   t.osborn@uea.ac.uk
phone:    +44 1603 592089
fax:      +44 1603 507784
web:      http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~timo/
sunclock: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~timo/sunclock.htm

</x-flowed>
