date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:22:56 +0100
from: "Palmer Dave Mr \(LIB\)" <David.Palmer@uea.ac.uk>
subject: FW: Freedom of Information request (FOI_07-04)
to: "Phil Jones" <p.jones@uea.ac.uk>, "Mcgarvie Michael Mr  k364" <m.mcgarvie@uea.ac.uk>

   Gents,

   My head is beginning to spin here but I read this as meaning that he wants the raw station
   data; we don't know which data belongs to which station, correct?  Our letter stated:


   "We can, however, send a list of all stations used, but without sources. This would include
   locations, names and lengths of record, although the latter are no guide as to the
   completeness of the series."


   Can we put this on the web?  Perhaps I am being really thick here but I'm not sure if
   putting this on the web will actually satisfy Mr. Eschenbach - we've said we don't have
   data sources, he says the external websites don't have them, so who does? Are we back to
   the NMS's?  I am happy to give this one more go, stating exactly what we are putting on the
   web and seeing if that suffices. Should Mr. Eschenbach still insist that we actually
   possess the information in the form he requests, I can then only give the file to Kitty
   Inglis for review and then we move on formally....



   Cheers, Dave
     ______________________________________________________________________________________

   From: Willis Eschenbach [mailto:willis@taunovobay.com]
   Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 9:37 PM
   To: Palmer Dave Mr (LIB)
   Subject: Re: Freedom of Information request (FOI_07-04)

   Dear Mr. Palmer:
   It appears we have gone full circle here, and ended up back where we started.
   I had originally asked for the raw station data used to produce the HadCRUT3 dataset to be
   posted up on the UEA website, or made available in some other form.
   You refused, saying that the information was available elsewhere on non-UEA websites, which
   is a valid reason for FOI refusals.

     I can report that the information requested is available on non-UEA websites as detailed
     below.

   Your most recent letter (Further _information_letter_final_070418_rev01.doc), however, says
   that you are unable to identify the locations of the requested information. Thus, the
   original reason for refusing to provide station data for HadCRUT3 was invalid.
   Therefore, since the information requested is not available on non-UEA websites, I wish to
   re-instate my original request, that the information itself be made available on your
   website or in some other form. I understand that a small amount of this data (about 2%,
   according to your letter) is not available due to privacy requests from the countries
   involved. In that case, a listing of which stations this applies to will suffice.
   The HadCRUT3 dataset is one of the fundamental datasets in the current climate discussion.
   As such, it is vitally important that it can be peer reviewed and examined to verify its
   accuracy. The only way this can be done is for the data to be made available to other
   researchers in the field.
   Once again, thank you for your assistance in all of this. It is truly not a difficult
   request, and is fully in line with both standard scientific practice and your " CODE OF
   PRACTICE FOR RESPONDING TO REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
   2000". I am sure that we can bring this to a satisfactory resolution without involving
   appeals or unfavorable publicity.
   My best regards to you,
   w.
     ______________________________________________________________________________________

   on 4/20/07 1:02 AM, Palmer Dave Mr (LIB) at David.Palmer@uea.ac.uk wrote:

     Mr. Eschenbach,
     Attached please find a response to your email of 14 April. As always, don't hesitate to
     contact me with queries or concerns.
     Cheers, Dave Palmer
     <<Further _information_letter_final_070418_rev01.doc>>
     ____________________________
     David Palmer
     Information Policy Officer
     University of East Anglia
     Norwich, England
     NR4 7TJ
