date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:53:13 -0400
from: "Bamzai, Anjuli" <Anjuli.Bamzai@science.doe.gov>
subject: RE: Information on your DOE award
to: P.Jones@uea.ac.uk


I'll put 1995. If any different, let me know. Else no need to email. 

Bean counting, bean counting ...sigh!







-----Original Message-----
From: P.Jones@uea.ac.uk [mailto:P.Jones@uea.ac.uk] 
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 10:51 AM
To: Bamzai, Anjuli
Subject: RE: Information on your DOE award



 Anjuli,
  At home, so from memory. It has to be a multiple
 of 3 years and after Tom Wigley left, so it must
 be 1995.

   Tom left in 1993 and the 1992 one would have had him
 first.

 Cheers
 Phil


> When did it start with you as PI? I need that year for 1.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: P.Jones@uea.ac.uk [mailto:P.Jones@uea.ac.uk]
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 10:46 AM
> To: Bamzai, Anjuli
> Subject: Re: Information on your DOE award
>
>
>
>  Anjuli,
>
>   1. 2004 was the last renewal. It originally started though  in 1979,

> but it was for Tom Wigley then. When the next  renewal comes through 
> it will be the 10th.
>
>  2. 1977
>
>  Cheers
>  Phil
>
>
>> Dear PI,
>>
>> For an upcoming Committee of Visitors of the program, I need the 
>> following information:
>>
>> 1. Start year of your current award. If you've been on renewals, it 
>> should be the year your DOE award first started. E.g. for SciDAC PIs 
>> whose awards got renewed in 2004, the start year would be 2001.
>>
>> 2. Year you were granted your Ph.D.
>>
>> I can look it up each individual award in the hard copy files, but 
>> thought an email from you may be the best way of collecting the info 
>> efficiently.  Please send me a 2 line response. If you are unsure of 
>> 1., at least provide a response to 2.
>>
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
>> Anjuli
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>




