date: Fri Jun 30 16:24:22 2000
from: Keith Briffa <k.briffa@uea.ac.uk>
subject: Re: Advance 10K <fwd> Re-Final payment
to: J.Sear@uea.ac.uk

   Janet ,
   the Gottingen underspend was intended to come to us to cover extra work done here . The
   Stockholm money, we expected to keep to cover the cost of a publication . I did not know
   anything about the Finland budget and I do not want to give them anything. However, I am
   worried that if the money does come here it will just disappear to cover our overspend. Can
   you hold off for a week on Gottingen ,The Finns , and Stockholm and when I get back from
   Switzerland , a week Monday , I could come and discuss this with you. The Swedes definitely
   intended some of the money to go to the special issue of a journal that we are still
   committed to producing.
   Also , I have been contacted by Eugene Vaganov (Krasnoyarsk) . He is sending new forms and
   I think we should just do as the two Russians request. Have we heard from Brussels? The
   Russians are in real need of the money and we should try to accommodate them. They are sure
   other INTAS grants are paid as they are suggesting. Can you PLEASE try to push this along.
   Thanks
   Keith
   At 04:10 PM 6/30/00 +0100, you wrote:

     Dear Keith,
     I am in the process of distibuting the final monies on above EC Project, but need to
     know if
     there were any agreements about how much of the Budgets were to be transferred due to
     underspent Budgets by Stockhom and Gottingen.
      The Final result is that Stockholm underspent by 9.7k uro and Gottingen 16.7k uro,
     totalling 26.4k uro, whilst UEA have overspent 23.6k uro.  However we are also aware
     that
     Finnish Forest, an Associate contractor to University Helsinki, Finland have vastly
     overspent by some 103k uro, Alison did a revaluation in October last year before the
     CS's
     were submitted to the EC.
     The normal practice is to utilise any underspend proportionately to an overspent
     contractor
     so in this case most of the overspent monies would go to the Finnish Forest.  As we
     never
     received a reply at the time to Alison's email asking about any Budget transfers (email
     attached), can you let me know how you want the monies distributed therefore.
     Janet
     ---------------------------
     J.Sear
     Finance Research
     Registry Building
     University of East Anglia
     NORWICH, Norfolk NR4 7TJ
     Tel: 0044-1603-593216
     Fax: 0044-1603-593860
     Received: from [139.222.168.29] (helo=finalison)
             by mailserver1.uea.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 3.02 #1)
             id 1381wY-0000sn-00
             for J.Sear@uea; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:38:58 +0100
     From: Alison Wardle <A.Wardle@uea.ac.uk>
     Sender: k172@mailserver1.uea.ac.uk
     Reply-To: a.wardle@uea.ac.uk
     To: J.Sear@uea
     Subject: Advance 10K <fwd>
     Message-ID: <SIMEON.10006301519.Q@finalison.mailserver1.uea.ac.uk>
     Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:41:19 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
     Read-Receipt-To: Alison Wardle <k172@mailserver1.uea.ac.uk>
     Disposition-Notification-To: Alison Wardle <k172@mailserver1.uea.ac.uk>
     Priority: NORMAL
     X-Mailer: Simeon for Win32 Version 4.1 Build (3)
     X-Authentication: IMSP
     MIME-Version: 1.0
     Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="Part10006301519.P"
     --- Begin Forwarded Message ---
     Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 09:02:39 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
     From: Alison Wardle <k172@mailserver1.uea.ac.uk>
     Subject: Advance 10K <fwd>
     Sender: k172@mailserver1.uea.ac.uk
     To: J.Sear@uea
     Reply-To: a.wardle@uea.ac.uk
     Message-ID:
     <SIMEON.9910200939.B@finalison.mailserver1.uea.ac.uk>
     Janet
     This is the last e-mail I sent to Keith Briffa.  Following
     this he asked Sue to go ahead with the 1000 payment to the
     Russians.
     The Forest Research Institute have confirmed that they have
     no further costs, so it is just Helsinki who haven't
     responded.
     --- Begin Forwarded Message ---
     Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 16:22:51 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
     From: Alison Wardle <k172@mailserver1.uea.ac.uk>
     Subject: Advance 10K
     Sender: k172@mailserver1.uea.ac.uk
     To: K.Briffa@uea
     Reply-To: a.wardle@uea.ac.uk
     Message-ID:
     <SIMEON.9910181651.E@finalison.mailserver1.uea.ac.uk>
     Dear Keith
     After taking pending salary recharges into account for
     Kelly & Harris, UEA expenditure stands at 271162 Euros
     against a budget of 249000.
     This does not include the 1000pounds to the Russian
     subcontractor.  Sue Boland has held back payment due to the
     grant being overspent.
     I attach a revised version of my spreadsheet.  You will see
     that UEA has overspent by 22kEuro and Gottingen and
     Stockholm have underspent by 28kEuro.  Was there any
     agreement about how much of the budgets were to be
     transferred?
     I have still heard nothing from Helsinki or the Forestry
     Research Institute.  Once you are happy with the UEA claim
     I will have to forward the cost statements we have
     received.  The stragglers can then be sent separately.
     Alison Wardle
     Finance Division
     x3780
     --- End Forwarded Message ---
     Alison Wardle
     Finance Division
     x3780
     --- End Forwarded Message ---
     Alison Wardle
     Finance Division
     x3780
