date: Fri May  2 11:47:01 2008
from: Tim Osborn <t.osborn@uea.ac.uk>
subject: Re: WET dataset(s)
to: Ian Harris <i.harris@uea.ac.uk>

   harry - the wetsyn netCDF file seems full of crap! stripey like when you previously
   combined 0.5 normals with 2.5 anomalies, though somehow much worse!  No variability in Jan
   or Apr, stripey in Jul and Oct.
   Tim
   At 10:16 02/05/2008, you wrote:

     Hi
     I've made a complete run of half-degree synthetic-only WET to be used
     with the observed + 2.5-degree synthetic WET as follows:
     Option 1: No obs after 1989
     Use 1901-1989 decadal files from /cru/cruts/version_3_0/secondaries/ wet/wet_final/
     Use 1990-2006 decadal files from /cru/cruts/version_3_0/secondaries/
     wet/wet_final_synthetic/
     (if you'd like single files for each period let me know)
     Option 2: synthetic only
     Use all files from /cru/cruts/version_3_0/secondaries/wet/ wet_final_synthetic/
     Cheers
     Harry
     Ian "Harry" Harris
     Climatic Research Unit
     School of Environmental Sciences
     University of East Anglia
     Norwich NR4 7TJ
     United Kingdom
